Re: [RDD] Centralized RD System?

[marcos <mromero@xxxxxxxx>]

On 7/3/09 1:18 PM, "Cowboy" <curt@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Some things have changed since the original concept, so it may
> not work as well as originally envisioned.
> Things like "real time" audio meters kinda screw up that plan, but
> originally you could run the whole silly thing from a command line
> with no GUI at all, so no fancy bells and whistles.

Hi,
May be your are referring to something different, so please correct me and
forgive my ignorance.  From the very beginning we configured our Rivendell
system to work from a central server.  It has wonderfully worked.  I have 5
work station connected to the server.  We have the audio and the data base
installed in the server, but each workstation runs its own Rivendell
software and its own sound card.  I don't see the need to install sound
cards in the server, since you will still need enough audio channels and
streams to the particular needs of each work station.  But I insist, may be
you are referring to something else.

Nevertheless, I am concerned by your statement.  Does Rivendell is still
being conceived as a system to run from a central server? Or should I begin
making plans for a new paradigm?


marcos e.

_______________________________________________
Rivendell-dev mailing list
Rivendell-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.rivendellaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/rivendell-dev